Thanks for the reply,
For using PJSIP:
-- When an endpoint registers I get only this :
"-- Added contact 'sip:6001@My.IP.IP.IP:14737;transport=UDP;rinstance=68516eaae9d9ff89' to AOR '6001' with expiration of 3600 seconds
[Jun 1 15:32:27] NOTICE[7757]: res_pjsip_mwi.c:679 mwi_new_subscribe: AOR 6001 has no configured mailboxes. MWI subscription failed
[Jun 1 15:32:27] WARNING[7758]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:2870 pubsub_on_rx_publish_request: No registered publish handler for event presence
"
-- When try to make a call from 6003 extension to 6001extension, I get this:
"[Jun 1 15:37:52] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:2870 pubsub_on_rx_publish_request: No registered publish handler for event presence
[Jun 1 15:37:52] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:2870 pubsub_on_rx_publish_request: No registered publish handler for event presence
[Jun 1 15:37:52] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:608 subscription_get_handler_from_rdata: No registered subscribe handler for event presence.winfo
[Jun 1 15:37:52] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:608 subscription_get_handler_from_rdata: No registered subscribe handler for event presence.winfo
-- Executing [6001@from-internal:1] Dial("PJSIP/6003-00000002", "PJSIP/6001,20") in new stack
-- Called PJSIP/6001
-- Nobody picked up in 20000 ms
-- Auto fallthrough, channel 'PJSIP/6003-00000002' status is 'NOANSWER'
[Jun 1 15:38:13] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:2870 pubsub_on_rx_publish_request: No registered publish handler for event presence
[Jun 1 15:38:13] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:608 subscription_get_handler_from_rdata: No registered subscribe handler for event presence.winfo
[Jun 1 15:38:13] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:2870 pubsub_on_rx_publish_request: No registered publish handler for event presence
[Jun 1 15:38:13] WARNING[7840]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:608 subscription_get_handler_from_rdata: No registered subscribe handler for event presence.winfo"
==> This is a failed call.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparing to PJSIP, when using the old "chan_sip", I get :
-- When an extension registers, I get this :
" Registered SIP '6001' at 10.82.3.1:45665
> Saved useragent "Z 3.3.25608 r25552" for peer 6001"
-- When try to make a call from 6003 extension to 6001extension, I get this :
" == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5
-- Executing [6001@from-internal:1] Dial("SIP/6003-00000004", "SIP/6001,20") in new stack
== Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5
-- Called SIP/6001
-- SIP/6001-00000005 is ringing
-- SIP/6001-00000005 answered SIP/6003-00000004
-- Channel SIP/6003-00000004 joined 'simple_bridge' basic-bridge <a2a0cb6d-ca53-43ba-949b-665417370969>
-- Channel SIP/6001-00000005 joined 'simple_bridge' basic-bridge <a2a0cb6d-ca53-43ba-949b-665417370969>
> Bridge a2a0cb6d-ca53-43ba-949b-665417370969: switching from simple_bridge technology to native_rtp
> Remotely bridged 'SIP/6001-00000005' and 'SIP/6003-00000004' - media will flow directly between them
> Remotely bridged 'SIP/6001-00000005' and 'SIP/6003-00000004' - media will flow directly between them
-- Started music on hold, class 'default', on channel 'SIP/6001-00000005'
> 0x7faee40046c0 -- Probation passed - setting RTP source address to 10.82.3.1:8002
> 0x7faee40046c0 -- Probation passed - setting RTP source address to 10.82.3.1:8002
-- Stopped music on hold on SIP/6001-00000005
-- Channel SIP/6001-00000005 left 'native_rtp' basic-bridge <a2a0cb6d-ca53-43ba-949b-665417370969>
-- Channel SIP/6003-00000004 left 'native_rtp' basic-bridge <a2a0cb6d-ca53-43ba-949b-665417370969>
== Spawn extension (from-internal, 6001, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/6003-00000004'"
===> And of course using the old chan_sip never failed.
And thanks in advance.
Statistics : Posted by wilwil • on Thu May 28, 2015 8:06 am • Replies 15 • Views 598
For using PJSIP:
-- When an endpoint registers I get only this :
"-- Added contact 'sip:6001@My.IP.IP.IP:14737;transport=UDP;rinstance=68516eaae9d9ff89' to AOR '6001' with expiration of 3600 seconds
[Jun 1 15:32:27] NOTICE[7757]: res_pjsip_mwi.c:679 mwi_new_subscribe: AOR 6001 has no configured mailboxes. MWI subscription failed
[Jun 1 15:32:27] WARNING[7758]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:2870 pubsub_on_rx_publish_request: No registered publish handler for event presence
"
-- When try to make a call from 6003 extension to 6001extension, I get this:
"[Jun 1 15:37:52] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:2870 pubsub_on_rx_publish_request: No registered publish handler for event presence
[Jun 1 15:37:52] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:2870 pubsub_on_rx_publish_request: No registered publish handler for event presence
[Jun 1 15:37:52] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:608 subscription_get_handler_from_rdata: No registered subscribe handler for event presence.winfo
[Jun 1 15:37:52] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:608 subscription_get_handler_from_rdata: No registered subscribe handler for event presence.winfo
-- Executing [6001@from-internal:1] Dial("PJSIP/6003-00000002", "PJSIP/6001,20") in new stack
-- Called PJSIP/6001
-- Nobody picked up in 20000 ms
-- Auto fallthrough, channel 'PJSIP/6003-00000002' status is 'NOANSWER'
[Jun 1 15:38:13] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:2870 pubsub_on_rx_publish_request: No registered publish handler for event presence
[Jun 1 15:38:13] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:608 subscription_get_handler_from_rdata: No registered subscribe handler for event presence.winfo
[Jun 1 15:38:13] WARNING[7839]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:2870 pubsub_on_rx_publish_request: No registered publish handler for event presence
[Jun 1 15:38:13] WARNING[7840]: res_pjsip_pubsub.c:608 subscription_get_handler_from_rdata: No registered subscribe handler for event presence.winfo"
==> This is a failed call.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparing to PJSIP, when using the old "chan_sip", I get :
-- When an extension registers, I get this :
" Registered SIP '6001' at 10.82.3.1:45665
> Saved useragent "Z 3.3.25608 r25552" for peer 6001"
-- When try to make a call from 6003 extension to 6001extension, I get this :
" == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5
-- Executing [6001@from-internal:1] Dial("SIP/6003-00000004", "SIP/6001,20") in new stack
== Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5
-- Called SIP/6001
-- SIP/6001-00000005 is ringing
-- SIP/6001-00000005 answered SIP/6003-00000004
-- Channel SIP/6003-00000004 joined 'simple_bridge' basic-bridge <a2a0cb6d-ca53-43ba-949b-665417370969>
-- Channel SIP/6001-00000005 joined 'simple_bridge' basic-bridge <a2a0cb6d-ca53-43ba-949b-665417370969>
> Bridge a2a0cb6d-ca53-43ba-949b-665417370969: switching from simple_bridge technology to native_rtp
> Remotely bridged 'SIP/6001-00000005' and 'SIP/6003-00000004' - media will flow directly between them
> Remotely bridged 'SIP/6001-00000005' and 'SIP/6003-00000004' - media will flow directly between them
-- Started music on hold, class 'default', on channel 'SIP/6001-00000005'
> 0x7faee40046c0 -- Probation passed - setting RTP source address to 10.82.3.1:8002
> 0x7faee40046c0 -- Probation passed - setting RTP source address to 10.82.3.1:8002
-- Stopped music on hold on SIP/6001-00000005
-- Channel SIP/6001-00000005 left 'native_rtp' basic-bridge <a2a0cb6d-ca53-43ba-949b-665417370969>
-- Channel SIP/6003-00000004 left 'native_rtp' basic-bridge <a2a0cb6d-ca53-43ba-949b-665417370969>
== Spawn extension (from-internal, 6001, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/6003-00000004'"
===> And of course using the old chan_sip never failed.
And thanks in advance.
Statistics : Posted by wilwil • on Thu May 28, 2015 8:06 am • Replies 15 • Views 598